Staff-level AI training built around your actual workload — not a demo reel. Open enrolment seats for individuals and small teams, or a scoped in-house programme for a whole department, delivered across the region.

Two years ago the conversation in most regional boardrooms — Bridgetown, Port of Spain, Kingston, Georgetown, Nassau — was whether generative AI was a serious business tool or a novelty. That argument is over. The question now is narrower and more uncomfortable: staff are already using these tools, usually on personal accounts, usually without guidance, and usually without anyone senior knowing which client information has been pasted into a chat window.
That is the real trigger for most of the training enquiries we receive. It is rarely a grand transformation programme. It is a marketing manager producing campaign copy in a fraction of the time, a finance team quietly summarising reports, an administrator drafting correspondence — and a leadership team that has realised the capability is spreading faster than the policy governing it. Training is how you get ahead of that: it standardises what "good" looks like, removes the guesswork, and gives everyone the same floor to work from.
The second driver is competitive. The Caribbean is a set of small, service-heavy economies where professional firms, hospitality operators, distributors and financial services businesses compete on responsiveness and quality of output. A team that can turn a proposal around in an afternoon instead of three days is not marginally better off — it wins work the slower firm never sees. That gap compounds quietly, and it is already visible from Barbados to Trinidad and Tobago, Jamaica, Guyana and the OECS.
The third is retention. Capable people want to work somewhere that equips them. Employers who invest in AI capability are finding it easier to keep mid-career staff who would otherwise assume the organisation is falling behind.
Most disappointing AI training fails in the same way: someone demonstrates a tool, everyone nods, nobody changes how they work on Monday. The tool was never the problem. The problem is that people do not have a repeatable method for handing work to an AI system and getting something usable back.

These are genuinely different products and they suit different situations. Choosing wrongly is the most common way organisations waste a training budget.
Individual seats on scheduled public sessions. You are buying access to a fixed curriculum alongside participants from other organisations across the region. Best for one to five people, for testing the quality of delivery before committing a department, or for a manager who wants capability now rather than after a procurement cycle. Priced per seat, bookable immediately.
A programme designed for one organisation, using your workflows, your documents, your tone of voice and your policy constraints. Confidential — nobody outside your team is in the room. Best for a whole department, for regulated environments, and where the objective is a measurable change in how a function operates rather than individual upskilling.
If you cannot yet name the specific business process you want improved, start with open enrolment. If you can name it — and it involves more than eight people — an in-house engagement will cost less per head and produce far more usable output.
Full curriculum and dates for the public tracks are on the AI training tracks page. The scoping process, deliverables and proposal turnaround for in-house work are set out on the corporate training page.
Professional services firms — legal, accounting, advisory — where the product is written output and the constraint is senior time. Hospitality and tourism operators managing high content volume across markets. Distributors and retailers running lean marketing functions. Financial services and insurance organisations that need capability and governance introduced together. Government agencies and statutory bodies modernising internal reporting and public communication. Growing SMEs where one person is doing three jobs and AI is the only realistic way to add capacity without adding headcount.
It is a poor fit in one situation: when an organisation wants a certificate rather than a change in how work gets done. We will say so during discovery rather than take the booking.
Open enrolment seats on the Amplifi Academy Masterclass are $149 USD per person, which covers five live sessions, the workbook, recordings and the prompt library. In-house corporate engagements start from $2,500 USD for a scoped team session and from $4,000 USD for a multi-session enablement programme. Per-person cost falls sharply with group size: a 20-person in-house programme usually lands between $200 and $300 per head depending on how much custom material is built.
Barbados, Trinidad and Tobago, Jamaica, Guyana, The Bahamas, Belize and across the OECS, plus diaspora and international teams that join the same virtual cohorts. Standard delivery is virtual in the evenings because that is what most teams can attend without losing a working day. In-person delivery at your own offices is available anywhere in the region and quoted separately.
We cap interactive sessions at 20 to 25 participants. Beyond that, hands-on work stops being hands-on. Larger organisations run consecutive cohorts, usually department by department, which also lets each cohort's material be tuned to that function's work.
A laptop, a stable connection and a browser. We work with widely available tools and free tiers wherever possible so nobody is blocked on procurement during the programme. If your organisation has already licensed Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini or ChatGPT Enterprise, we teach on your stack instead of a generic one.
It is designed for non-technical staff. Participants are marketers, sales teams, operations managers, HR, finance and administrative staff. There is no coding. The measure of success is whether someone can complete a real piece of their own work faster and to a higher standard by the end of the session.
Yes, and for regulated organisations it usually should be. We can align the material to an existing acceptable-use policy, or run a short governance module covering data handling, client confidentiality, disclosure and human review before the practical work begins.
Participants keep the recordings, the prompt library and the workbook. Corporate clients also receive a short written summary of what the group produced, where capability sits by function, and what we would recommend next. Many organisations follow with a second cohort or a scoped capability audit.
Book a discovery call and we will tell you honestly whether open enrolment seats or a scoped in-house programme is the better use of your budget.
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyse site traffic. See our Cookie Policy for details.